论我国国际私法中的国有化问题
摘要：关于国有化问题一直是国际私法领域内长期存在着争议的问题，特别是国有化补偿标准方面。在对待国有化上，发展中国家与发达国家之间存在着一定的差异。发展中国家普遍认为任何国家都有权采取国有化的措施，如果实行国有化的国家对本国人不予以赔偿时，对外国人同意也不予以补偿。由此我们可以看出，发展中国家是持有“不予以补偿”的态度。而发达国家则采取了三原则基础上的补偿态度，该三原则是指“充分、有效、及时”。就我国而言，我国一直坚持“不予赔偿”的原则，但在有关国有化及其补偿问题上，我国的外资政策、外资立法以及中国缔结的双方协定的不一致使得该原则在适用中显得力不从心。本文将从我国国际私法中国有化的基础知识出发，结合我国国情和立法现状，参考国外先进经验，试图为完善我国国际私法中的国有化制度奉献出自己的绵薄之力。
Abstract: About the nationalization of private international law in the field has been along-standing dispute, especially state-owned compensation standard. In the treatment of nationalization, between developed countries and developing countries have some differences. The developing countries generally believe that any state has the right to take nationalization measures, if to nationalize the country to foreigners no compensation, agree and don’t compensate for foreigners. From this we can see, developing countries are held” no compensation” attitude. While the developed countries take the basis of the three principles of compensation of attitude, the three principle is that the full, effective, timely””. In our country, China has always adhered to the” compensation ” principle, but in relation to nationalization and compensation problem, our country foreign capital policy, foreign capital legislation and China concluded a bilateral agreement that the inconsistencies in the application of this principle is difficult. This paper from China’s private international law of China have basic knowledge sets out, combine the national conditions of our country and the present situation of legislation, the reference of foreign advanced experience, trying to perfect the private international law of China in the state-owned system dedicated their mianbozhili.
Keywords: nationalization; private international law; the principle of compensation and compensation principle
