摘要

在我国，侦查是指特定的机关为收集证据、查明案情、证实犯罪和缉拿犯罪嫌疑人而依法采取的专门调查工作和相关的强制措施。法律特别规定，禁止侦查机关用非法的方式进行侦查以获取证据。然而，侦查机关利用职权非法取证问题一直是司法实践中的一大顽疾。非法取证现象在实践中大量存在，相关的案例报道屡见不鲜，这不仅侵犯了宪法和法律赋予涉案公民的基本人权，而且严重玷污了司法的纯洁性，导致冤假错案，造成了极其恶劣的影响。长期以来，非法取证问题一直是困扰司法实践的一大顽疾，非法取证与刑事错案有因果关系，非法取证与人权保障有反对关系。本文从防止刑事错案的角度深入研究如何规范刑事案件的侦查取证程序及行为，继而思考如何根据中国现实情况，最大限度地实现刑事司法的实体正义，从根本上治理非法取证和减少刑事错案的发生据中国现实情况，最大限度地实现刑事司法的实体正义。

本文主要分为五部分。第一部分主要对非法取证的主要表现及危害进行了概述。第二部分主要是对新刑诉法进一步加强和完善了对侦查活动的监督、制约机制进行分析。第三部分主要是对我国新刑事诉讼法中非法取证方面存在的不足之处，并在第四部分对该不足的地方提出合理的建议，促进我国刑事非法取证的完善与发展。第五章是对全文的总结。

关键词：非法取证；侦查；宏观策略；体系

Abstract

In China, the investigation refers to the specific organ for the collection of evidence, to find out the case, confirmed the crime and arrest suspects in accordance with the law and take a special survey and relevant measures. The law prohibits special provisions, the investigation organ to use illegal means to conduct the investigation to obtain evidence. However, the investigation organ to mandate the use of illegal evidence is always a problem in the judicial practice. The phenomenon of illegal evidence exists a lot in practice, it is often seen. Relevant case reports, it not only violates the Constitution and the law the basic human rights of citizens, but also severely tarnished the purity, leading to miscarriage, resulting in an extremely bad influence. Long-term since, the illegal evidence collection problem is always to perplex judicial practice of a problem, the illegal evidence collection and misjudged criminal cases and there is a causal relationship, the illegal evidence collection and protection of human rights has opposed relationship. This article from the prevention of misjudged criminal cases and investigates how to regulate the criminal investigation procedure and behavior, and then think about how to according to the realistic conditions of China, to maximize the criminal justice, entity justice, fundamentally control the illegal evidence and reduce misjudged criminal cases occur according to Chinese reality, to maximize the realization of criminal justice, entity justice.

This paper is mainly divided into five parts. The first part is mainly about the illegal evidence of the main performance and the harm is summarized. The second part is mainly to the new criminal law to further strengthen and improve the supervision of investigation, restrict a mechanism analysis. The third part mainly is to our country new law of criminal procedure illegal evidence collection in the deficiencies, and in the fourth part of the deficiencies and puts forward reasonable suggestions, promoting our country’s criminal illegal evidence of improvement and development. The fifth chapter is a summary of the full text.

Keywords: illegal evidence; investigation; macroeconomic policy; system