长安街英菲尼迪车祸案的法理研究
长安街英菲尼迪车主陈家醉酒驾驶肇事案件，是一起典型的当事人醉酒驾驶引发交通事故并造成严重人员伤亡的案件。该案的犯罪人陈家最后被法院以以危险方法危害公共安全罪被判处无期徒刑。这虽然只是一起普通的交通肇事案件，但是由于行为人陈家具有醉酒驾驶的行为，而且还造成了“两死一重伤”的严重后果而备受社会各界的关注。有人认为陈家罪有应得，法院的判决并没有不当；而也有人认为法院以“以危险方法危害公共安全罪”定罪处罚并不符合我国刑法中对于醉酒驾驶肇事案件刑事法律的规定。这种争议的背后反映了我国刑事法律在醉酒驾驶肇事案件定罪与量刑过程中所出现的不确定性和争议性，从而也凸显了对于我国醉酒驾驶肇事行为定罪量刑问题进行理论研究和实践分析的必要性。
在我国当前的刑事法律中，对于醉酒驾驶肇事行为主要有三种规制方式，一是以《刑法修正案（八）》为基础的危险驾驶罪；其二就是以《刑法》第一百三十三条为基础的交通肇事罪；另一个则是以《刑法》一百一一条为基础的以危险方法危害公共安全罪。在这三个罪名体系中，由于彼此之间存在一定的间隔而无法对于醉酒驾驶肇事行为进行准确的定罪量刑，从而造成了刑罚上的畸轻畸重，影响了刑法的公平性原则。因此，本文针对这一问题对醉酒驾驶的相关概念进行了梳理，并结合陈家醉酒驾驶肇事案的有关情况，对于我国现有的司法体系中关于醉酒驾驶肇事犯罪行为的定罪和量刑问题进行了分析，并认为“交通肇事罪”与“以危险方法危害公共安全罪”罪名中间存在断档，从而导致法律与民意的失衡，并以此为基础提出增设“危险驾驶致人死伤罪”的建议，为我国醉酒驾驶肇事犯罪行为的规制找出了另一种思路
关键词：醉酒驾驶 定罪 量刑 危险驾驶致人死伤罪
Study on legal of the accident of Infiniti car Chang’an Avenue case
Abstract
Infiniti car owners in Chang’an Avenue Chen drunk driving accident cases, is a typical case of parties to drunk driving traffic accidents and inflicted severe casualties cases. The case of the criminal was finally court Chen to dangerous to approach the crime of endangering public safety was sentenced to life imprisonment. Although this is just an ordinary traffic accident cases, but because the perpetrator Chen has drunk driving behavior, but also caused the” two dead and one injured in” serious consequences and attracted the attention of social all circles. Some people think that the Chen family deserve one’s punishment, the court decision did not properly; while others think the court to” dangerous to approach the crime of endangering public security.” does not conform to the conviction and punishment of criminal law in our country for a drunk driving accident cases in criminal law. This controversy behind reflected our country criminal law in a drunk driving accident cases of conviction and sentencing process in the uncertain and controversial, and thus also highlighted for China’s drunk driving accident behavior issues on conviction and punishment of theoretical study and practical analysis of the necessity.
In China’s current criminal law, for a drunk driving accident behavior mainly has three kinds of control mode, a” criminal law amendment ( eight)” as the basis of the dangerous driving crime; second is to” criminal law” 133rd article based on traffic accident crime; another is to” criminal law” Yibaiyiyi strip based dangerous to approach the crime of endangering public security. In the three the system of accusation, because certain interval between each other not to drunk driving accident behavior for accurate conviction and sentencing, which resulted in a penalty on the lopsided, affected the fairness principle of criminal law. Therefore, this paper on drunk driving related concept undertook combing, combine Chen drunk driving accident on the situation, to our country existing judicial system about drunk driving accident crime conviction and measurement of penalty problem undertook an analysis, think ” the crime of causing traffic casualties” and” dangerous to approach the crime of endangering public safety.” there are archives, which led to legislation and the opinion of the imbalance, and propose the addition of ” dangerous driving causing casualties. ” proposal, for our country’s drunk driving accident crime regulation find another kind of train of thought
KEY WORDS：Drunk driving, Conviction, Sentencing, Dangerous driving charge
目 录
